AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Radeon X700 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and ATI Radeon X700 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 113.9x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 128 MB
- 10x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 1 April 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X700 SE
| Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | ATI Radeon X700 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 71 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | ATI Radeon X700 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | R400 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | RV410 |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 1 April 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | 495 | 497 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
