AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 1050 MHz
2.7x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1,024
2.7x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36624 vs 16641
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 82.563
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.586 vs 1266.506
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.473 vs 4.91
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 96.618 vs 70.779
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 507.291 vs 252.607

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 September 2016 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1120 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1,024
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624 vs 16641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64 vs 82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586 vs 1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473 vs 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618 vs 70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291 vs 252.607

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 vs 6622
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3597
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3208
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 vs 6622
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3597
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3208

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 95 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7779 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7779 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36624

16641

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

112.64

82.563

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.586

1266.506

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.473

4.91

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

96.618

70.779

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

507.291

252.607

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3360

Name	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624	16641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64	82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586	1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473	4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618	70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291	252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3597	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3208	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3597	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3208	3360
PassMark - G3D Mark		5594
PassMark - G2D Mark		413

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Ellesmere	GM204
Launch date	27 September 2016	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	502	504
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz
Core clock speed	1120 MHz	1050 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops	2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2304	1,024
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s	67.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus