AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon E9550 MXM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1120 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1975 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- 2600.1x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 36624
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 27 September 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1120 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 vs 36624 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3597 vs 2786
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3597 vs 2786
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3208 vs 2243
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3208 vs 2243
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 vs 2786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 vs 2243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 3597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 3597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3208 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | 36624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 27 September 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 504 | 505 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1120 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
ATIFireGL V7300
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce 720A
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
