AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6250 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6250

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
4.1x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 94 vs 52
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1005 vs 392
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1005 vs 392

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 January 2011 vs 9 May 2007
Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	80 vs 16
Floating-point performance	104 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	512 MB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	94 vs 52
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1005 vs 392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1005 vs 392

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 19 Watt
Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 51 vs 30

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 19 Watt
Memory clock speed	1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	51 vs 30

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6250
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1005

392

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1005

392

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6250	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
PassMark - G2D Mark	30	51
PassMark - G3D Mark	94	52
Geekbench - OpenCL	1244
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	444
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	444
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1005	392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1005	392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	347

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 6250	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla
Code name	Cedar	G86
Launch date	31 January 2011	9 May 2007
Place in performance rating	1671	1669
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	650 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	104 gflops	25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	80	16
Texture fill rate	5.2 GTexel / s	3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt	10 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI	No outputs
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	8 GB / s	9.5 GB / s
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1188 MHz
Shared memory	1	yes
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory type		GDDR3, GDDR2
Technologies
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
nView