AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6250 and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 30 vs 22
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 vs 10 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 48.96 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 vs 22 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 116 vs 94
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2949 vs 1244
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1167 vs 1005
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1167 vs 1005
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 vs 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2949 vs 1244 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1167 vs 1005 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1167 vs 1005 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | NVIDIA GeForce 310M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | 22 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 94 | 116 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1244 | 2949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1005 | 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1005 | 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6250 | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GT218 |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1670 | 1671 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 48.96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |