AMD Radeon HD 6290 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6290 and NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6290
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 589 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 31 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 666 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1185 vs 1052
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1185 vs 1052
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 December 2011 vs 27 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1185 vs 1052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1185 vs 1052 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 42 vs 32
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 135 vs 105
- 12.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2724 vs 220
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 42 vs 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 135 vs 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2724 vs 220 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6290
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 | 42 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 105 | 135 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 220 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1185 | 1052 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1185 | 1052 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6290 | NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GT218 |
Launch date | 4 December 2011 | 27 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1644 | 1645 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 5.33 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 666 MHz |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |