AMD Radeon HD 6370M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 23% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 610 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • 17.2x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 189 Watt
  • 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 83
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 November 2010 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 610 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 11 Watt vs 189 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 401 vs 83

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

  • 8.1x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 240 vs 80
  • 5.2x better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 120 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 276
  • 6.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18229 vs 2744
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3319 vs 1885
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3319 vs 1885
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 48.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 240 vs 80
Floating-point performance 622.1 gflops vs 120 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1201 vs 276
Geekbench - OpenCL 18229 vs 2744
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3319 vs 1885
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3319 vs 1885

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
276
1201
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
401
83
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2744
18229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1885
3319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1885
3319
Name AMD Radeon HD 6370M NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
PassMark - G3D Mark 276 1201
PassMark - G2D Mark 401 83
Geekbench - OpenCL 2744 18229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1885 3319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1885 3319

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6370M NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla 2.0
Code name Robson GT200B
Launch date 26 November 2010 11 November 2008
Place in performance rating 1233 1236
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,499
Price now $178.89
Value for money (0-100) 8.02

Technical info

Core clock speed 750 MHz 610 MHz
Floating-point performance 120 gflops 622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 80 240
Texture fill rate 6 GTexel / s 48.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 11 Watt 189 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 1,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0