AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 25x more pipelines: 400 vs 16
- 12.2x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 600 MHz
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 116 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 31 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6570M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Capilano | GT218 |
Launch date | 28 October 2009 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1661 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1402 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
Transistor count | 627 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |