AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and ATI FireMV 2200 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 240 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 937x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 937 vs 1
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 153
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 vs 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 153 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
- 66.7x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 | 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6750M | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Whistler | RV280 |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1087 | 1088 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCI |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |