AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.3x more pipelines: 480 vs 112
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 937 vs 457
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 58
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3304
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 vs 457 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 1813
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 1813
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 1813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 | 457 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Whistler | G92 |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1086 | 1087 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6750M with others
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5500
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
ATIFireMV 2200 PCI
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
