AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 480 vs 336
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 11 October 2010 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 336 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 vs 4.363
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 214.155
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.331
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 vs 13.844
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 vs 30.439
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3331
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1813
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3331
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 vs 4.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 vs 214.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.331 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 vs 13.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 vs 30.439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | 661.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | 1.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | 28.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 | 76.736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Whistler | GF104 |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 11 October 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1087 | 1088 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 873.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6750M with others
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
ATIFireMV 2200 PCI
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon HD 6750M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
