AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 480 vs 336
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date 4 January 2011 vs 11 October 2010
Pipelines 480 vs 336
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 52% better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 vs 4.363
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 214.155
  • 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.331
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 vs 13.844
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 vs 30.439
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1813
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3331
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1813
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3331
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 873.6 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
Memory clock speed 3400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.202 vs 4.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 661.765 vs 214.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.872 vs 0.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.112 vs 13.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 76.736 vs 30.439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3712 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3712 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3331

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.363
22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
214.155
661.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.331
1.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.844
28.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30.439
76.736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1813
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3331
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1813
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3331
3353
Name AMD Radeon HD 6750M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 937
PassMark - G2D Mark 487
Geekbench - OpenCL 9432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.363 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 214.155 661.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.331 1.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.844 28.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.439 76.736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1813 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3331 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1813 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3331 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6750M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Whistler GF104
Launch date 4 January 2011 11 October 2010
Place in performance rating 1080 1081
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 576.0 gflops 873.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 480 336
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s 36.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 210 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 108.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 3400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0