AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.8 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 480 vs 120
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 174 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 937 vs 150
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 23 January 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 120 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 vs 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 155 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 600 MHz
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 | 150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6750M | ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Whistler | RV635 |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 23 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1093 | 1095 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 174 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 5.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 378 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |