AMD Radeon HD 6750M vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750M and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 335
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 2799
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 800 vs 480
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
• 3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1345 vs 937
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 9432
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.373 vs 4.363
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 vs 214.155
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.906 vs 0.331
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 vs 13.844
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 vs 30.439
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 vs 1813
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 vs 1813

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	937 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	487 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9432 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.363 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	214.155 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.331 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.844 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.439 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 2799

Compare specifications (specs)