AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon HD 6750M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 614.4 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1238 vs 937
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.167 vs 4.363
Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 409.102 vs 214.155
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.772 vs 0.331
Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.064 vs 13.844
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.259 vs 30.439
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2091 vs 1813
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3331
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2091 vs 1813
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3331

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 May 2011 vs 4 January 2011
Texture fill rate	19.2 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 480
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1238 vs 937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.167 vs 4.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	409.102 vs 214.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.772 vs 0.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.064 vs 13.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	66.259 vs 30.439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2091 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	5078 vs 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2091 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	5078 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750M

2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 351
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9432 vs 2880

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	487 vs 351
Geekbench - OpenCL	9432 vs 2880

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1238

937

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

351

487

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2880

9432

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.167

4.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

409.102

214.155

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.772

0.331

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.064

13.844

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

66.259

30.439

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

1813

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5078

3331

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

1813

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5078

3331

Name	AMD FirePro V5900	AMD Radeon HD 6750M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1238	937
PassMark - G2D Mark	351	487
Geekbench - OpenCL	2880	9432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.167	4.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	409.102	214.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.772	0.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.064	13.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	66.259	30.439
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2091	1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	5078	3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2091	1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	5078	3331

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro V5900	AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 3	TeraScale 2
Code name	Cayman	Whistler
Launch date	24 May 2011	4 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1091	1093
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	600 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	480
Texture fill rate	19.2 GTexel / s	14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	2,640 million	716 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	230 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0