AMD Radeon HD 6770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 4.2x more pipelines: 800 vs 192
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 601.3 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 316 vs 304
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 302.509
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.004 vs 0.965
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 vs 14.925
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 27.656
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 2160
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3325
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 2160
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 January 2011 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 800 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 601.3 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 vs 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 vs 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 vs 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 106 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 72% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1316 vs 1250
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4923 vs 3802
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 vs 9.69
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 2279
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 2279
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1316 vs 1250 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4923 vs 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 vs 9.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 2279 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1250 | 1316 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3802 | 4923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Juniper | GF106 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 21 January 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1144 |
Price now | $76.99 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.17 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |