NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 vs 1262
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 vs 3802
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 9.69
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 1.004
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 26.748
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 2546
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 2279
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 2546
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 2279

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 231
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 509.958
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 53.992
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1714 1262
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	231 318
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5605 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.673 9.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.958 615.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.512 1.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.422 26.748
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.992 115.157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2836 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2728 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358

Compare specifications (specs)