AMD Radeon HD 6770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 192
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 316 versus 304
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 302.509
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.004 versus 0.965
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 versus 14.925
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 27.656
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 2160
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3325
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 2160
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3325
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 January 2011 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 800 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 versus 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 106 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 72% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1316 versus 1250
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4923 versus 3802
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.758 versus 9.69
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 2279
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 2279
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1316 versus 1250 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4923 versus 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 versus 9.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 2279 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1250 | 1316 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3802 | 4923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.69 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.004 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2279 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2279 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Juniper | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 21 January 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $129 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1133 | 1144 |
Prix maintenant | $76.99 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.17 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 198 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 76.8 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |