AMD Radeon HD 7450A vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7450A and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 69 Watt
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 26 April 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.5 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 400 vs 160
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 288
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 385
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1671 vs 668
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2211 vs 902
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2211 vs 902
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3326 vs 1592
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3326 vs 1592
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 vs 288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1671 vs 668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2211 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2211 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 vs 1592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 vs 1592 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7450A
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7450A | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 288 | 1204 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 668 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 902 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 902 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1592 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1592 | 3326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 321.782 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.777 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7450A | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Caicos | Redwood |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1102 | 1104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |