AMD Radeon HD 7450M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7450M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 24.3x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 434
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3333
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 25 January 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3059 vs 330
- 22.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10723 vs 476
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1832
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3059 vs 330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10723 vs 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1832 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 330 | 3059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 434 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 476 | 10723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 | 3333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7450M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Seymour | GF114 |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 25 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 814 | 815 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $138 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 224.0 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |