NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 8.6x more texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 960 vs 160
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1967 vs 330
- 13x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6174 vs 476
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1832
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1832
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1967 vs 330 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6174 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 328
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3350
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1967 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6174 | 476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.831 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3493 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 7 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 821 | 823 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
