AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1702 vs 1624
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1702 vs 1624
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 11 October 2010 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 vs 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 vs 1624 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 599 vs 289
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 vs 152
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2242 vs 791
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 540
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1044
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 540
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 599 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2242 vs 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 1044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 289 | 599 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 791 | 2242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 540 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 | 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 540 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 | 1624 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Caicos | GF108 |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 11 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1499 | 1501 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $35.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |