AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M2000 and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 480 vs 160
- 2x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 425 vs 289
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 206 vs 152
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1168 vs 791
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 544 vs 540
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1498 vs 1044
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 544 vs 540
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1498 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 July 2012 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1168 vs 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 544 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1498 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1709 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 544 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1498 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1709 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M2000 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 425 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1168 | 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.284 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.801 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 544 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1498 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1709 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 544 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1498 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1709 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M2000 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Turks | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 July 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1498 | 1499 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | chip-down | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |