AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
| Launch date | 2 October 2012 vs 11 October 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 332
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 129
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1378 vs 1061
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1153
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1153
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2177
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2177
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 291.8 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 129 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1378 vs 1061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 vs 1153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 vs 1153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 2177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 2177 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP | ATI Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 332 | 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 195 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1061 | 1378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1153 | 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1153 | 1883 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2177 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2177 | 3360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Scrapper | Turks |
| Launch date | 2 October 2012 | 11 October 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1385 | 1387 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 291.8 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 9.12 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 39 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 716 million |
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP with others
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
