AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 66 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 258 vs 244
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 vs 235.463
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.487 vs 0.463
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 38.551

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 624 gflops
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 727 vs 612
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1898 vs 1548
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.918 vs 14.033
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 vs 1389
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 2724
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 vs 1389
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 2724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	612 727
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	258 244
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1548 1898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.874 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	259.769 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.487 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.033 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.396 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1389 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2724 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3348

Compare specifications (specs)