NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1011 vs 611
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3074 vs 1548
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.142 vs 4.874
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 262.321 vs 259.769
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.741 vs 0.487
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.571 vs 14.033
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1389
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1011 vs 611 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3074 vs 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.142 vs 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 262.321 vs 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.741 vs 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.571 vs 14.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 vs 1389 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 572.2 gflops
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 18.406
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2207
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2207
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 624 gflops vs 572.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 vs 256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 vs 18.406 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 vs 2207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 vs 2207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1011 | 611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 | 257 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3074 | 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.142 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 262.321 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.741 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.571 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.406 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2207 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2207 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Turks |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $265.27 | |
Place in performance rating | 1258 | 1260 |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |