NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1013 vs 612
  • Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3061 vs 1548
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.142 vs 4.874
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 262.321 vs 259.769
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.741 vs 0.487
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.571 vs 14.033
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1389
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1389
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 5 January 2012
Core clock speed 745 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1013 vs 612
Geekbench - OpenCL 3061 vs 1548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.142 vs 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 262.321 vs 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.741 vs 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 16.571 vs 14.033
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1726 vs 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1726 vs 1389

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
  • Around 9% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 572.2 gflops
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 258 vs 256
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 18.406
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2207
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2207
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 480 vs 384
Floating-point performance 624 gflops vs 572.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 258 vs 256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 57.396 vs 18.406
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2724 vs 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2724 vs 2207
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1013
612
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
256
258
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3061
1548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.142
4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
262.321
259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.741
0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.571
14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.406
57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1726
1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2207
2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1726
1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2207
2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3355
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000M AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark 1013 612
PassMark - G2D Mark 256 258
Geekbench - OpenCL 3061 1548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.142 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 262.321 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.741 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 16.571 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.406 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1726 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2207 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1726 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2207 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3355

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M AMD Radeon HD 7570

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK107 Turks
Launch date 1 June 2012 5 January 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $265.27
Place in performance rating 1258 1260
Price now $149.95
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 8.53

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops 624 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 480
Texture fill rate 23.84 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0