NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 617
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2860 vs 1516
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.142 vs 4.874
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 262.321 vs 259.769
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.741 vs 0.487
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.571 vs 14.033
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1726 vs 1389
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1726 vs 1389

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 572.2 gflops
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 260 vs 255
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 18.406
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2207
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2207

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1012 617
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 260
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2860 1516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.142 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.321 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.741 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.571 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.406 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2207 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2207 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3355

Compare specifications (specs)