NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 624 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1445 vs 614
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 256
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4062 vs 1550
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.837 vs 4.874
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 vs 259.769
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.098 vs 0.487
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.798 vs 14.033

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 vs 33.754
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1389 vs 1094
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3176
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1389 vs 1094
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3176

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1445 614
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	269 256
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4062 1550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.837 4.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	405.086 259.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.098 0.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.798 14.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.754 57.396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3176 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1389
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3176 3355

Compare specifications (specs)