AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs ATI FirePro M7820
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and ATI FirePro M7820 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2709
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2709
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 1 May 2010 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 vs 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 vs 2709 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7820
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 800 vs 480
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 624 gflops
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 10.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15792 vs 1550
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.956 vs 4.874
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.944 vs 259.769
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.869 vs 0.487
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.146 vs 14.033
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.902 vs 57.396
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 624 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15792 vs 1550 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.956 vs 4.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.944 vs 259.769 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.869 vs 0.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.146 vs 14.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.902 vs 57.396 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7820
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI FirePro M7820 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 | 15792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | 4.956 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | 600.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | 0.869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | 21.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | 103.902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI FirePro M7820 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Turks | Broadway |
| Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 1 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1254 | 1256 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 624 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7570 with others
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
ATIFirePro M7820
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6670
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
