AMD Radeon HD 7570 versus AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7570 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 66 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 52% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 258 versus 244
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 235.463
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.487 versus 0.463
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.396 versus 38.551
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 versus 19 April 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 66 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 versus 244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 versus 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 versus 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 versus 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.2 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 624 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 727 versus 612
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1898 versus 1548
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.918 versus 14.033
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 versus 1389
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 versus 2724
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 versus 1389
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 versus 2724
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 624 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 727 versus 612 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1898 versus 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 versus 14.033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 versus 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 versus 2724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 versus 1389 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 versus 2724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 612 | 727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1548 | 1898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7570 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Turks | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 | 19 April 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1260 | 1261 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $102.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 716 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 7570 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 280M
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6670
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
AMDRadeon HD 7570 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
