AMD Radeon HD 7570 vs ATI Radeon HD 4860
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570 and ATI Radeon HD 4860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 9 September 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4860
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 896.0 gflops vs 624 gflops
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 896.0 gflops vs 624 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI Radeon HD 4860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 611 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7570 | ATI Radeon HD 4860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
Code name | Turks | RV790 |
Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 9 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1250 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624 gflops | 896.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 22.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 959 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |