AMD Radeon HD 7570M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570M and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
  • 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
  • Around 79% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
  • 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 10.149
  • Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 23.677
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 905 vs 894
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1633
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2327
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 905 vs 894
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1633
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2327
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 January 2012 vs 13 January 2011
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 400 vs 96
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 45 Watt
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.489 vs 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.722 vs 23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 905 vs 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1797 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2352 vs 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 905 vs 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1797 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2352 vs 2327

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

  • Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 570 vs 428
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 190
  • Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2133 vs 1096
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.218 vs 3.109
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 vs 199.164
  • Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 vs 0.333
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 570 vs 428
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 vs 190
Geekbench - OpenCL 2133 vs 1096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.218 vs 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 207.789 vs 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.52 vs 0.333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
428
570
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
190
193
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1096
2133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.109
5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
199.164
207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.333
0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.489
10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42.722
23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
905
894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1797
1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2352
2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
905
894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1797
1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2352
2327
Name AMD Radeon HD 7570M NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 428 570
PassMark - G2D Mark 190 193
Geekbench - OpenCL 1096 2133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.109 5.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 199.164 207.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.333 0.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.489 10.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.722 23.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 905 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1797 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2352 2327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 905 894
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1797 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2352 2327

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7570M NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Thames GF108
Launch date 7 January 2012 13 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1440 1443
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $174.95
Price now $99.95
Value for money (0-100) 8.91

Technical info

Boost clock speed 650 MHz
Core clock speed 500 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 400 96
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s 11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0