AMD Radeon HD 7570M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7570M and NVIDIA Quadro 1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 10.149
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 23.677
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 905 vs 894
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1633
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2327
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 905 vs 894
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1633
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 13 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.489 vs 10.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 vs 23.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 905 vs 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1797 vs 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 vs 2327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 905 vs 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 vs 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 vs 2327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 567 vs 427
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 190
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2123 vs 1085
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.218 vs 3.109
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 207.789 vs 199.164
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.52 vs 0.333
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 567 vs 427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2123 vs 1085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.218 vs 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 vs 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.52 vs 0.333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 427 | 567 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1085 | 2123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.109 | 5.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 199.164 | 207.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.333 | 0.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.489 | 10.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 | 23.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 905 | 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1797 | 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 | 2327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 905 | 894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 | 1633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 | 2327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7570M | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Thames | GF108 |
Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 13 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1446 | 1448 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $174.95 | |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |