NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 889 MHz vs 650 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 653 vs 428
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 1090
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 3.109
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.333
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 10.489
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 905
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 2352
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 905
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 2352

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

• Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
• Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 vs 129
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 vs 151.304
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 39.301
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1426
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1426

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	653 428
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	129 191
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1090
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.572 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.304 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.808 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.943 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.301 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2352

Compare specifications (specs)