NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 510 and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 701 vs 428
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 190
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1677 vs 1096
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.809 vs 3.109
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.399 vs 0.333
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 905
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 905

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

• 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 vs 111.269
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 3.385
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 9.522
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 976
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 1720
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 976
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 1720

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 428
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	290 190
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 1096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.809 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.269 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.399 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.385 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.522 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1211 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	976 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 2352

Compare specifications (specs)