AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1876
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1876
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 3 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 360 MHz
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 364
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 112
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 364 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 364 | 576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1232 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Tesla |
Code name | Devastator | G92 |
Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1259 | 1262 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 497 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 1463 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-IV |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |