NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 360 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 364
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 112
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3029 vs 1232
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 1810
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 1810

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP

• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 55 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7620G IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1012 364
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 112
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3029 1232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2207 1810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2207 1810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3357

Compare specifications (specs)