AMD Radeon HD 7650M vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7650M and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 437 vs 290
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.699 vs 2.747
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 220.859 vs 104.498
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.375 vs 0.27
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 vs 9.69
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1042 vs 664
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 1602
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 vs 664
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 1602

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 vs 60
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1367 vs 1191
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 1733
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 1733

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	437 290
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	60 110
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1191 1367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.699 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.859 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.375 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.624 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1949 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1949 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1733 2848

Compare specifications (specs)