Intel HD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2x more boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 688 vs 437
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 60
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2441 vs 1191
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 7 January 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 688 vs 437 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 vs 60 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2441 vs 1191 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 40x more pipelines: 480 vs 12
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1042 vs 1017
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 464
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1733 vs 845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 vs 1017
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 464
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1733 vs 845
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops vs 422.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 7650M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 688 | 437 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 60 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2441 | 1191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 1042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 1949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 1042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 1949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 1733 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 680 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.375 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Thames |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1523 | 1526 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 550 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |