NVIDIA GRID K1 vs AMD Radeon HD 7650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K1 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 38.3x more texture fill rate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 10.8 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 4x 192 vs 480
• 3x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 442
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 62
• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1976 vs 1207
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.591 vs 3.699
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 1042
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 1042

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650M

• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 220.859 vs 169.864
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.375 vs 0.336
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 vs 10.43
• 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 vs 354
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1733 vs 319
• 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 vs 354
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1733 vs 319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K1
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	651 442
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	259 62
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1976 1207
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.591 3.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	169.864 220.859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.336 0.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.43 44.624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 1042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 1733

Compare specifications (specs)