AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 355555.6x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 129
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2401
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2401
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 2401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 2401 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 760 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 416 vs 314
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4543 vs 783
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 985 vs 359
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 vs 359
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1386
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 760 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 416 vs 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4543 vs 783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 1386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 1386 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 129 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 314 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 783 | 4543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 2401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 2401 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Scrapper Lite | Jet |
Launch date | July 2013 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1378 | 1434 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 2 | 5 |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |