AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 668 MHz
- 568755.8x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 10.69 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 vs 92
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2417
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2013 vs 3 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 668 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 10.69 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 vs 92 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 2417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 2417 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 432 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 432 vs 312 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 92 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 | 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 2417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 2417 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
Code name | Scrapper Lite | RV670 |
Launch date | July 2013 | 3 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1382 | 1379 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 668 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 10.69 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 666 million |
Floating-point performance | 427.5 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 53.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |