AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs AMD Radeon R7 M270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 307070.7x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1386 vs 527
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 527
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2081
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2081
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 2081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 2081 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 148
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 767 vs 312
- 8.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 783
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 359
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 148 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 767 vs 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6810 vs 783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R7 M270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 153 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 783 | 6810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 2081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 2081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.826 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | AMD Radeon R7 M270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Scrapper Lite | Opal |
Launch date | July 2013 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1382 | 1384 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory type | Not Listed | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |