AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

AMD Radeon R7 M270

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

Around 5% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 725 MHz
307070.7x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1386 vs 527
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 527
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2081
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2081

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	760 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate	6080 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1386 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1386 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3112 vs 2081
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3112 vs 2081

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 150
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 767 vs 314
8.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 783
4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 359
4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 359

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	9 January 2014 vs July 2013
Pipelines	384 vs 128
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	153 vs 150
PassMark - G3D Mark	767 vs 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	6810 vs 783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1747 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1747 vs 359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

150

153

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

314

767

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

783

6810

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

359

1747

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

359

1747

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1386

527

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1386

527

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3112

2081

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3112

2081

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP	AMD Radeon R7 M270
PassMark - G2D Mark	150	153
PassMark - G3D Mark	314	767
Geekbench - OpenCL	783	6810
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	359	1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	359	1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1386	527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1386	527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3112	2081
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3112	2081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.826

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP	AMD Radeon R7 M270
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Code name	Scrapper Lite	Opal
Launch date	July 2013	9 January 2014
Place in performance rating	1378	1380
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Technical info
Compute units	2
Core clock speed	760 MHz	725 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	194.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines	128	384
Pixel fill rate	3040 GPixel/s
Render output units	4
Texture fill rate	6080 GTexel/s	19.8 GTexel / s
Texture Units	8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt
Transistor count	1,303 million	1,040 million
Floating-point performance		633.6 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11.2	11
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
Mantle
Memory
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory type		Not Listed
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore