AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 128 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 15 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 112 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 8.8x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 261
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops vs 102.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 261 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 261 | 454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 89 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Kalindi | G92 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 15 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1348 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | |
Price now | $328.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.78 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 420 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |