AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 160 vs 96
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 3200x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 158
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 121.217 vs 83.907
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.947 vs 17.41
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 vs 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 vs 17.41 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 248
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 785
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.046 vs 2.342
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.371 vs 0.275
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.791 vs 6.14
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 383 vs 248 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1571 vs 785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.046 vs 2.342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.371 vs 0.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 vs 6.14 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 | 158 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | 383 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 785 | 1571 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.342 | 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 121.217 | 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.275 | 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.14 | 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.947 | 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Caicos | GF108 |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1595 | 1554 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 248.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 6.2 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |