AMD Radeon HD 8650M vs AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650M and AMD Radeon Pro 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650M
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 7 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650M | AMD Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35755 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8650M | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Mars | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2013 | 18 March 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 365 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
| Transistor count | 900 million | 5700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | No | |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Enduro | ||
| PowerPlay 7.0 | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
