AMD Radeon HD 8670D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 533 vs 479
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 141
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3257
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3257
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 June 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 533 vs 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 186 vs 141
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 vs 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 vs 3257

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2229 vs 2087
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 999 vs 920
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 999 vs 920
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 1980
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 1980
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2229 vs 2087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 999 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 999 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2333 vs 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2333 vs 1980

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
533
479
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
186
141
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2087
2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
920
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
920
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1980
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1980
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3340
3257
Name AMD Radeon HD 8670D NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark 533 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 186 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 2087 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 920 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 920 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1980 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1980 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340 3257

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8670D NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Essentials

Architecture Terascale 3 Fermi 2.0
Code name Richland GF117
Launch date 4 June 2013 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1206 1208
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 844 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 96
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 585 million

API support

DirectX 11 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus