AMD Radeon HD 8670D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670D and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1980 vs 1631
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1980 vs 1631
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1974
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1974
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 vs 1 March 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1980 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1980 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1974 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 844 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 530
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 185
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 2087
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 920
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 920
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 844 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1577 vs 530 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 185 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 vs 2087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 vs 920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 vs 920 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 530 | 1577 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2087 | 4071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 920 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 920 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1980 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1980 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 1974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Kepler |
Code name | Richland | GK107 |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1206 | 1207 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $164.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |