AMD Radeon HD 8670D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 73
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 vs 23 December 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 73 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 844 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1513 vs 534
- 10.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22124 vs 2071
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 844 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 vs 534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 vs 2071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | 1513 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 73 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2071 | 22124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Richland | GT200B |
Launch date | 4 June 2013 | 23 December 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1201 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 1476 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 159.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |