AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and AMD Radeon HD 8670D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 883 vs 533
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 321 vs 186
Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3715 vs 2087
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 vs 920
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1980
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 vs 920
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1980

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 August 2014 vs 4 June 2013
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	883 vs 533
PassMark - G2D Mark	321 vs 186
Geekbench - OpenCL	3715 vs 2087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1494 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2329 vs 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1494 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2329 vs 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Around 34% higher core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 630 MHz
Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320

Core clock speed	844 MHz vs 630 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 320

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

883

533

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

321

186

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2087

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2329

1980

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2329

1980

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3340

Name	AMD FirePro W2100	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
PassMark - G3D Mark	883	533
PassMark - G2D Mark	321	186
Geekbench - OpenCL	3715	2087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	289.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	50.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1494	920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2329	1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1494	920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2329	1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1058

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro W2100	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Terascale 3
Code name	Oland	Richland
Launch date	12 August 2014	4 June 2013
Place in performance rating	1205	1206
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	680 MHz
Core clock speed	630 MHz	844 MHz
Floating-point performance	435.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	320	384
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	400 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	Low Profile / Half Length
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11
OpenGL	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory type	n / a
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Powerplay