AMD Radeon HD 8670M vs AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670M and AMD Radeon HD 7660D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 633 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 520 vs 509
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 178
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 vs 2107
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1039 vs 1001
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1039 vs 1001
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 26 September 2012 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 633 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 vs 509 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 vs 2107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 vs 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 vs 1001 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660D
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2159 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 2270
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2159 vs 1783
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 2270
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2159 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 vs 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2159 vs 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 vs 2270 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | AMD Radeon HD 7660D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 509 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 178 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 2107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 2159 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 2159 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | AMD Radeon HD 7660D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Mars | Trinity |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1173 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 800 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 633 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |