AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and AMD Radeon HD 8670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1146 vs 520
• Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8851 vs 5532
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 7.005
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 144.131
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.952
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 17.551
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 71.696
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1039
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2270
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1039
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2270

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 193
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1783 vs 1765
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1783 vs 1765

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1146 520
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	193 488
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8851 5532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.633 7.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	525.038 144.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.169 0.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.076 17.551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.404 71.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 2270
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 2270

Compare specifications (specs)