AMD Radeon HD 8830M vs AMD FirePro S10000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8830M and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8830M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5106 vs 3621
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5106 vs 3621
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11302 vs 3321
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11302 vs 3321
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 vs 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 vs 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 84.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 640
- 8.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7867 vs 2695
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7867 vs 2695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7867 vs 2695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7867 vs 2695 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | AMD FirePro S10000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2695 | 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2695 | 7867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 | 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 | 3621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 | 3321 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4768 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8830M | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Venus | Tahiti |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 434 | 435 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 2x 3,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 4096 |
| Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,313 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 480 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 8830M with others
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
AMDFirePro S10000
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 v2
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 8830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
